patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Text of Quarry-Killing Legislation Released

The complete text for the legislation backed by the Pechanga tribe is available to the public.

 

The text of the legislation that, if passed, would kill a proposed quarry was released.

The bill, called AB 742, is backed by the Pechanga tribe. It would prevent mining near sites considered sacred to Native Americans.

To read the text, which was made available on Tuesday, click on the image of the PDF to the right.

To read more about what the tribe had to say about the bill, click here.

To read about what Granite Construction, the company planning the mine, had to say about it, click here.

Related Topics: AB 742, Gary Johnson, Pechanga Tribe, granite construction, granite quarry, liberty quarry, quarry near temecula, and temecula quarry
What do you think of the bill? Tell us in the comments.

Don

7:21 pm on Sunday, August 21, 2011

Regardless of what Gary Johnson from Granite says, the Pechangas did bring up their concerns about their "sacred ground", back in 2005 when we all started to fight against this quarry.All the facts were brought up at the last meeting and there should be no argument about it. The truth will prevail.

Reply

Leroy Achoy

8:17 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

This is a job killer for ALL of California.
The state is bleeding jobs as companies are moving out of the state.
The Early Asian Immigrants AKA The Indians will claim every rock out cropping is the site of the First man on Earth or some other fictional story to block all activity in the state.
Soon there will be more free loaders getting hand out from the state that taxpayers paying in.
Is that what you want a total welfare state?
As that happens you will see productive members of our state moving their companies and jobs to state like Airzona & Texas.

http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2011/04/19/ocregister-69-more-firms-move-jobs-facilities-out-of-california/

What will your house be worth when the only people left are Section 8 renters?

Pull your heads out of the sand.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerry Simeon

8:54 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

Leroy, there is nothing wrong in what you are saying !! What the people of this region is saying is take it somewhere else. Level of difficulty=0.00. Granite is intent on spending large sums of money and cramming this project up our rears for greed and displaying some kind of nefarious power?? What I, individually, am saying is this is the 21st century. We are not Trolls or Dwarfs who only think of STRIP mining the earth for its riches no matter what and with no concern. This is our "Mother" planet. Obviously, like no other. We are inevitably bound to it. Think outside of the BOX for job creation that nurtures, enhances, and propels us as a people and nation into the next century with a sense of dignity, pride, and in brotherhood. I say too, that on the day each of us were born,,,,,, the world changed. Was it for good or not? Why has this become such a major issue beyond what the people have expressed except to test our resolve.

Saving Rainbow

8:22 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

The most important thing to remember about this bill is that it is SITE SPECIFIC!
THIS LEGISLATION WILL NOT AFFECT MINING OR JOBS ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE STATE.
Do NOT be fooled by the propaganda being passed around by the Granite people.

Reply

Rich Loomis

8:30 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

I am up set the way in which Indians just seem to wait until the eleventh hour and be able to get legislation written and prepared from Assemblywoman Bonnie Lowenthal. This tell me, the power of the dollar can change even sacred land to a bill introduced into the California Legislature, and possibly be able to stop industry and jobs where we live. All this in the name of protected so call sacred unprovable
land that so Chief was cremated.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerry Simeon

9:03 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

Rich, if you don't mind me saying, it is much easier to accomplish a thing when the people are supporting. This has been the Indian way for millennium and it is the way chiefs have been chosen and decisions made. The councils, The "Pow-Wow" today, are just reminders of what once were serious Indian conventions. When there was a problem it was taken to the assembly of chiefs and the wise where cooler heads generally prevailed. How is this any different now? Greed, either avaricious or "power" related, makes "politics" expensive sometimes.

Leroy Achoy

8:33 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

IT IS NOT SITE SPECIFIC. It clearly states within 2000 yards of any Indian reservation or "sacared site".
This is a job killer for ALL of California.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

9:43 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

So then you are suggesting that "ALL of California" is within 2000 yards of an Indian reservation? Of course it's site specific; if it wasn't it would ban mining everywhere in the state.

Comment_arrow

Leroy Achoy

1:18 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Read it it says: with in 5000 yards of a "Sacred Site" what ever Early Asian Immigrants might think is some BS fictional site.
Remember before the Spainsh arrived the Early Asian Immigrants lived in a Stone Age era life. No written language , no metal tools, ECT.
Maybe they should go back to that way of life.

Comment_arrow

Chris

1:26 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

@Leroy -- Wow, your ignorance regarding the history of Native Americans is amazing. Beyond pointing out some of your beliefs regarding the origins of the Native Americans that have already been widely discredited for many years, might I suggest you revisit your OWN abilities (or lack thereof) regarding written language before you cast stones.

Popeye

8:53 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

This is definitely not a job killer. Something is wrong when people want everything so close to each other. Next you want a landfill and powerplant in your backyard so you do not want to walk so far. Drive around California, there are alot of locations to mine without impacting people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rich Loomis

11:25 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

Popeye,
I know that your heart what you said is what you believe. But let's consider just for a moment the City of Temecula was on Tribal land. Under the treaty they have it is a sovereign nation and we don't have any authority to just build our town on their land. It is the same thing relating to them. This is our country, and they have their country. When it was decided, they established sacred land and got it. Just because the Indians of old walked this land does not give them any privileges and setting out spots now a sacred.

Comment_arrow

Chris

12:06 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

@Rich -- You oversimplify.

#1 Indian reservations ('sovereign nation' or not) are still a part of the United States and Native Americans are American citizens who have just as much as right to lobby their representatives to legislate laws that impact them as any other American citizens. Members of the reservations are subject to federal law and to state criminal law, even while on their reservation land, or 'sovereign nation'. This isn't as simple as 'our country, their country', or somehow comparable to Mexico telling us not to build a quarry.

#2 The reservations that were allocated to tribes were forced. It is erroneous to imply Native Americans agreed to the reservations, their boundaries, etc. These were dictated, not negotiated.

Comment_arrow

Jerry Simeon

12:13 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Rich, if Our only Home, the Planet Earth, or the U.S. Homeland was being attacked by aliens, wouldn't you fight to defend it? The scenario you describe regarding the sovereign reservations was created by European invaders as it applies to mostly worthless land. It is, at minimum, a compliment to the United States to have established these miniscual parcels for the protection of the aboriginal people who continue to contribute to this civilization despite the brutality and savagery they have experienced. Now what?? .. prejudice, intolerance, and envy?

Leroy Achoy

8:55 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

The area is Zoned RR. which allows mining.

Reply

Brenda S

9:56 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

Here are the Senators you need to E-mail ASAP
Here are the emails for the Senator’s offices.  Just copy and paste the emails as a group and one of the messages below to send or create your own message. In subject line type “Support AB 742”.  Include your name address and phone # after your message.
 
Senator.cannella@senate.ca.gov
Senator.evans@senate.ca.gov
Senator.fuller@senate.ca.gov
Senator.kehoe@senate.ca.gov
Senator.lamalfa@senate.ca.gov
Senator.padilla@senate.ca.gov
Senator.pavley@senate.ca.gov
Senator.simitian@senate.ca.gov
Senator.wolk@senate.ca.gov
 Pass this on.

Reply

Brenda S

10:00 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

Here are the phone numbers to call. please pass this on, and please call or email these Senators ASAP time is short!

Phone Calls -Here is an example of what you need to say when you call the Senator’s Office.  The Senator’s assistant will take the message and note that you are in favor of the passage of AB 742.  It is that simple:
 
My name is________________,  I am from ________________(city) and I am in favor of the passage of AB 742 which will preserve our Santa Margarita River, protect Pechanga’s sacred Native American sites and prevent mining in this area.
 
Senator Pavely
Phone: (916) 651-4006

Senator La Malfa
Phone: (916) 651-4004
 
Senator Cannella
Phone: (916) 651-4012

Senator Evans
Phone: (916) 651-4002
 
Senator Fuller
Phone: (916) 651-4018
 
Senator Kehoe
Phone: (916) 651-4039
           
Senator Padilla
Phone: (916) 651-4020
 
Senator Simitian
Phone: (916) 651-4011
 
Senator Wolk
Phone: (916) 651-4005

Steve McCarthy Committee Republican Consultant
Phone: (916) 651-1501

Reply

Brenda S

10:03 am on Monday, August 22, 2011

Make those important calls and emails to the Senators today if you have not already done so.  I have simplified the format below to make it easy to copy and paste the email addresses all at one time.  This bill goes to the committee Tuesday, tomorrow, August 23.
 
As you know we have been fighting Granite Quarry for many years.  We have an urgent opportunity to help stop this from occurring but we need your help.  Pechanga has sponsored a bill AB 742 which would protect their sacred and historical lands in the area of the proposed quarry site.  If this bill is passed it would virtually stop the quarry.  This is our very best chance yet…. Please send this on and ask neighbors and friends to help.  All that is needed are simple phone calls and emails to 9 senators who are on the Naturals Resources and Water Committee.  Granite Quarry is launching a great campaign to stop this bill from being passed.   For those of you who are skeptical and think you cannot make a difference think back to SSRC fighting the transmission towers in Temecula and winning.  This was the first time in history a grassroots organization stopped a project like this.  This occurred because everyone was willing to make phone calls, send emails, write letters and go to meetings!
 LET'S DO IT PEOPLE, THIS IS OUR HOMES THEY WILL RUIN WITH THIS QUIRRY!!!!!!

Reply

Rich Loomis

12:49 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Comment regarding what I believe and what is happening are two different things. 1St, the Reservation was what the tribes wanted is something that I had nothing to do with. I realize that we are all American Citizens, the laws applied on the reservation are not necessarily equal off the reservation. I will site those who have worked for a tribe, for example a worker for a Casino you are not protected as a worker as off the res. I am aware also, that the pioneers who came here many years ago did not have the given authority from the government to take what they wanted as well. But that isn't the issue. It is off the reservation that I am concerned about. In order for me to be convinced the land that Granite has is sacred, then why is the Tribe having laws written by Bonnie Lowenthal, if passed that bill will kill jobs everywhere because a tribe can just say it is sacred. Then they claim that what they have is confidential and we can't see it, as what they have of sacred land is not for us to see. Show me a map or proof that it is so that is my concerns.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

1:11 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

@Rich --

Actually, the reservation is something that was dictated by the federal government, it is not something the tribes wanted, negotiated, or had any kind of say in whatsoever. Many reservations in the U.S. are NO WHERE near the specific tribes' actual regions of origin because they were moved out of convenience. Pechanga lucked out and got SOME land that was theirs originally, but again, they were never given any input into what the boundaries were to be; this was all dictated by the federal government. Given the proximity of the quarry site to the actual reservation, it doesn't take much of a stretch of the imagination to believe that it could quite possibly be an area of interest to the tribe which INDISPUTABLY occupied the land before any other settlers and before being forced from it.

Reservations really function more as quasi-states, with some of their own reservation laws but still subservient to state criminal law as well as federal law.

And again, Native Americans are American citizens with every right to lobby their elected representatives for legislation that matters to them and affects them, on OR off of their reservation.

Comment_arrow

Leroy Achoy

1:26 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Slip and break a leg or your neck at Pachanga Casino and see if you if you can sue them for negligence injury.

http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_3/02_florey.pdf

Comment_arrow

Chris

1:32 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

@Leroy -- I said state criminal law. Lawsuits have nothing to do with CRIMINAL law. Lawsuits are CIVIL, not CRIMINAL.

Leroy Achoy

1:33 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Asian nomads are thought to have entered the Americas via the Bering Land Bridge (Beringia), now the Bering Strait and possibly along the Northwest coast. Genetic evidence found in Amerindians' maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) supports the theory of multiple genetic populations migrating from Asia.[1][2] Over the course of millennia, Paleo-Indians spread throughout North America and South America. Exactly when the first group of people migrated into the Americas is the subject of much debate.

Reply

Leroy Achoy

1:33 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

One of the earliest identifiable cultures was the Clovis culture, with sites dating from some 13,000 years ago. However, older sites dating back to 20,000 years ago have been claimed. Some genetic studies estimate the colonization of the Americas dates from between 40,000 to 13,000 years ago.[3] The chronology of migration models is currently divided into two general approaches. The first is the short chronology theory with the first movement beyond Alaska into the New World occurring no earlier than 14,000 – 17,000 years ago, followed by successive waves of immigrants.[4][5][6][7] The second belief is the long chronology theory, which proposes that the first group of people entered the hemisphere at a much earlier date, possibly 50,000 - 40,000 years ago or earlier.[8][9][10][11]

Artifacts have been found in both North and South America which have been dated to 14,000 BP,[12] and humans are thought to have reached Cape Horn at the southern tip of South America by this time. The Inuit and related peoples arrived separately and at a much later date, probably during the first millennium CE, moving across the ice from Siberia into Alaska.

Reply

Chris

1:40 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

@Leroy -- Not impressed by your ability to copy/paste theories from an open source internet web site. I read it on the internet, it must be true!

Tell you what, give me 30 minutes, I'll go write an article titled "Granite Quarry" on Wikipedia that states the quarry is bad for Temecula Valley to wrap your mind around.

Reply

Leroy Achoy

2:00 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Everyone knows that the socalled "Native Americans aka the Indians " came from Asian.

http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ea210/SiberianOriginsNA.htm

Reply

Leroy Achoy

2:01 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

How about the job killing bill AB 742 that will send many companies and good paying jobs out of California?

When only WELFARE people are left in this state how much will your house be worth then?

All because you do not what a quarry? The area was zoned for mining long before you moved here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

2:05 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

I am not anti-job Leroy, or pro-handout, but there is a happy medium, and this site is CLEARLY not the best place for a quarry, with the vast majority of residents here against it. And yet, Granite insists on pursuing the project to the detriment of the health of local residents.

The area was zoned long before most ANYONE moved here. That doesn't make the zoning appropriate today.

Leroy Achoy

2:42 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Well you should have checked the zoning BEFORE you moved into the area.

The valley was a great place to be BEFORE all the greenhorns moved out here from OC.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

2:55 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

@Leroy --

#1 I lived here far before the incorporation of both Murrieta and Temecula.
#2 NO I shouldn't, the COUNTY needs to visit and revisit zoning to see if it remains consistent with development it has overseen. The county has zoned and administered the development and creation of two cities with populations of 100,000+ in this area, as well as a scenery/setting based tourist industry in wine country and other agriculture. Zoning that is inconsistent with this development, which the county oversaw and administered, can and SHOULD be changed to work in harmony with the overall community. Crying about the development after the fact is water under the bridge.

Kat

6:56 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Thank you Brenda! Just wrote , and will have my husband do so tonight
And thanks Leroy, for making me even more intent on helping this cause! Your insane comments pushed me to work harder these last few mins. we have.

Reply

Don

7:22 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

To Rich Loomis of Hemet, if you had attended the last neeting re the quarry, you would have heard all the reasons that the Pechangas are doing what they are doing. AB742 only pertains to the Indian reservations, and I see nothing wrong with that, do you .?
You also would have heard Garry Johnson tell us, under questioning of course, that Liberty at full production, would only employ about 50, workers, and the other 40, would be truck drivers, who have to own their own rigs, and would earn about 40K per year. A far cry from those 99 well paid jobs. It's time to face the truth, Rich.

Reply

Don

7:24 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

The saying, "Consider the scource" evidently applys to Leroy

Reply

Rich Loomis

8:09 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Don, first of all I am wanting all to have what is provably theirs. I want Granite to have what is rightfully their to make money with and create a cheaper aggregate, another thing if you haven't noticed we have a capitalistic society that is for all to enjoy, even the Tribe has a Golf Course, and a Casino. So, lets stop shooting arrows at each other, as we are not making any hits that effect a thing. I support Granite saying the amount of jobs that they create will depend on the economy, so it doesn't matter how long it is going to be. I heard Gary mention that with this economy, it is going to take a few years to ramp up totally. So what! How long did it take the Indians to get a Casino? It didn't matter. So let's grow up, and quit thinking what we say is going to amount to a thing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Popeye

6:29 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Sounds more like greed than saving the economy. There will be over 300000 people within a 10 mile radius downrange of daily blasting and harmful pollutants carried by the prevailing winds that can reach over 50mph. Greed is what brought our economy down, so let's not learn a lesson so we can make it worse. The supporters of the mine have their own misery so let's all keep it equal, so it benefits me only. Every supporter has the benefit me and my family only and not the majority that has jobs and families that live in the area, do the research.

Rich Loomis

8:11 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Popeye: Do you know what the word greed means? It is easy to say but hard to for a lot of people to understand. If you had the desire, perhaps you don't have, but if you could you would have what Granite has. That isn't greed, that is the way this Country works, remember we are not Socialist, meaning we all have the same things. We are a Country established by Capitalism. What I understand is that Granite hasn't asked for a stimulus a grant or governmental contributions to get this far, and have spent million as required to accomplish a permitted area in which to have their business developed to create jobs and aggregate, and hopefully a profit. So, Popeye how would you be able to have a job and get paid if there wasn't a Granite. It isn't greed at all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

9:26 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

@Rich -- You are correct, working to make money is not greed. However, making money to the detriment of others IS greed. Pushing aside a community's wishes, potentially damaging that community's economy, and having no regard for that community's HEALTH in order to make a buck most certainly qualifies as GREED.

Comment_arrow

Popeye

9:18 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Two things Rich. 1) I know what greed means, but I don't understand your question when I stated the word in the previous statement. I don't want to label you as ignorant. 2) I defiantly do not need Granite, nor does our community. Your are so opinionated from Hemet. Where is your buddy Rick Kellogg of Wildomar (The city that afford there own Parks)? Where is your buddy Adele Harrison who moved out of Temecula (Retired Public School Teacher/Republican/Oxymoron?)). The supporters especially you, Rick and Adele is about me, greedy me and Granite can pay me.

Leroy Achoy

9:46 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

I think that is a very small amount of people do not want the quarry.

With a 100k residents in Temecula there should be 15-25k showing to say that they do not want the quarry.

Less that 1% of the residents show up and say they do not want it.

1% is not a majority.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

9:53 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

@Leroy --

Boy, you are just grasping for straws aren't you? Maybe you can tell me, what controversial issue in any relatively sized community, anywhere, that has turned out 15-25% of the population at a meeting? It has absolutely no bearing. But if you insist on using the numbers of people showing up at meetings for or against as an indication of the level of support, then it's still clear that the majority of people GOING to the meetings are against it.

Comment_arrow

Popeye

11:25 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Out of touch. Most families in my neighbor make well over 100k a year which is the middle class. All are degreed professionals.

Comment_arrow

TVOR

7:02 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Then how about we put it to a ballot vote of Temecula residents and see what the result is?

Kat

9:53 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Leroy, i've laughed at most of your comments, because honestly I think your pulling legs, no one can be as misinformed and annoying as you without putting on an act, or so I hope, but on this you are WRONG buddy- now your starting to lie and i am sure you remember what your mama told you about lying

Reply

Kat

9:56 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Thats right Leroy what percentage of people (paid Granite workers, being paid to go) show up? a lot less % not to mention , not everyone can attend the meetings set up in the a.m for work purposes, thats why I skipped a few. Leroy, go bark up another tree

Reply

Leroy Achoy

10:42 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Enviro-Nazi
n. an environmentalist who is so anal over the cause that he or she feels it it entirely ok to trample on the rights of others to enforce his beliefs.
Most of these morons are ultra-left liberal flakes with no career ambitions or direction, but still need to find ways to keep others down in a futile attempt to elevate themselves. Many are also PETA members and all have socialist agendas.
Enviro-nazi examples are everywhere, from the bicyclists who occasionally stage a rally to block major bridges in rush hour in a vain attempt to blackmail normal people into giving up their cars to the protesters who turn up in droves with signs and attitude whenever they get word that somebody somewhere intends to cut down a tree or drill for oil.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

11:15 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Oh, we're sharing vocabulary words? Awesome, here is mine for you then!

de·lu·sion·al [dih-loo-zhuh-nl]
—adj
1. having false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions: Senators who think they will get agreement on a comprehensive tax bill are delusional.

2. Psychiatry . maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts, usually as a result of mental illness: He was so delusional and paranoid that he thought everybody was conspiring against him.

Sometimes, de·lu·sion·ar·y .

I'm hoping that you are limited to definition #1... but that remains to be seen.

Here is one more good example of the usage of the word:

You're either very good at self-satire, or delusional.

See Also:
delusion [dih-loo-zhuh]
— n
1. a mistaken or misleading opinion, idea, belief, etc: he has delusions of grandeur

2. psychiatry illusion (See also hallucination) a belief held in the face of evidence to the contrary, that is resistant to all reason

3. the act of deluding or state of being deluded

Learning is fun!

Comment_arrow

Popeye

11:27 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Obviously you do not know your demographics since this area votes conservative.

Comment_arrow

Chris

11:49 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

@Popeye --

Maybe another example of delusional?

Believing that a predominantly conservative-voting area is filled with "Enviro-Nazis" that block major bridges in rush hour traffic and chain themselves to trees.

Yeah, I'd say that fits the mold.

Rich Loomis

11:24 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Chris,
This is my complete feelings. The Tribe is saying the land in which Granite bought and wanting to build their quarry is on sacred land. I'm saying: prove to me that it is sacred! When the Granite Corporation bought the land, UCSD had been doing studies for 50 years, and there was no complaint, I'm just saying it isn't enough for me. I believe in the laws of these United States, and to be able to prove you have rights to something it is on you to show me the proof, in this case land that is at one time the Tribe claims is the beginning of :Mother Earth". Again, just saying so doesn't get it for me.
In the many years that have passed, I suppose there have been many people who walked on these mountains. All my friends that are Indians, I have never heard them talk about this area as sacred. My family had a Tribal Chief his name was, Ed La Chappa who worked for us for 35 years, again you would think a tribal chief would know land to be sacred. He was a Luiseno Indian in the Mission Tribe and chief of his reservation in Alpine. This is my whole thing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

11:43 am on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

@Rich --

I understand where you are coming from. Of course that begs the question, how does a tribe prove to you or anyone else that they have always held a certain religious belief? I know that Pechanga is maintaining that up to now, they have preferred to keep the belief private and within the tribe, and Pechanga also maintains that they have told Granite from day one that they are against the mine. Of course Granite claims just the opposite.

Although I can understand your skepticism, on the other hand, I don't find it to be a huge stretch of the imagination to believe that the land could, in fact, be considered sacred to the tribe, given its proximity to the reservation as well as the tribe's history in this entire area. I also would submit that doing studies on sacred land may not be perceived as harshly by the tribe as compared to creating an open-pit mine. Studies are benign, mining is not.

At any rate, with Pechanga's legislative push aside, there are numerous other reasons why this mine does not belong here.

Comment_arrow

TVOR

7:10 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

The people who came to be known as Pechanga settled in the hills southwest of Temecula about 10,000 years ago. They occupied the entire area and had burial grounds there. They were forced to abandon this area in the 19th century because of land grants that were made by Mexican governors who were the power in the area before California became officially a state.

Rich Loomis

12:06 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Chris, You are just assuming that the location is going to be detrimental to the health of many. I just can't understand how? I been in this area my whole life, for 40 years we raised thousands of turkeys on 16 ranches in this area. The closest was about 1 mile So. of the scales. I didn't have dust conditions from the silca which is in the soil. This is basically a scare that has been well done. I can't believe you. If you think the dust is bad for you, stay in you air conditioned home and don't leave. Be a Howard Hughes, wipe everything and ware a mask. This is crazy. Granite has volunteered to add many monitors, they didn't need to but said that they would be glad to help with any conditions caused by the blasting, by the way do you tell Pechanga that they will have to monitored the Casino, as they are requesting Granite to do at the quarry, they have something that is known to be harmful, the smoke inside the Casino. No person bitches about that KILLER.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

12:29 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

@Rich --

You comment as if I made up the concept of crystalline silica.

Fact: Inhaling finely divided crystalline silica dust in very small quantities (OSHA allows 0.1 mg/m3) over time can lead to silicosis, bronchitis, or cancer, as the dust becomes lodged in the lungs and continuously irritates them, reducing lung capacities. (In the body crystalline silica particles do not dissolve over clinically relevant periods of time.) Children, asthmatics of any age, allergy sufferers, and the elderly (all of whom have reduced lung capacity) can be affected in much less time. Amorphous silica, such as fumed silica is not associated with development of silicosis, but may cause irreversible lung damage in some cases. Laws restricting silica exposure with respect to the silicosis hazard specify that they are concerned only with silica that is both crystalline and dust-forming.

Laws are not written for those with 'Howard Hughes' syndrome. The danger is real, and given the prevailing winds that will blow the silica thrown in the air by the unnatural blasting of solid rock (as opposed to natural winds that you lived with as a turkey farmer) upon over 300,000 downwind residents, you will have to forgive me for OPPOSING a company that would have me and my family breath in carcinogens to make a buck.

Comment_arrow

TVOR

7:18 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

The difference with smoke inside the casino is you don't have to go inside the casino. We have no choice but to breathe the air outside and inside our homes.

Paul Jacobs

12:11 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Rich Loomis is typical of the misinformation and lies spread by Granite Construction and supporters of Liberty Quarry. 1) AB 742 is specific to the quarry site that is on the original tribal lands before the Pechanga people were forcibly evicted and put on the reservation. The bill mentions the Santa Margarita River that exists nowhere else in the state. It is not a "job-killing bill" so stop repeating that lie. 2) Show us the property deeds Granite Construction owns. They mostly have lease/options with landowners looking to cash in on otherwise virtually worthless property that is nearly impossible to develop. 3) The disrespect shown toward the Pechanga people is an unfortunate "Old Tradition" that hasn't died.

Reply

Leroy Achoy

12:48 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Wrong Read the TEXT:
It says: with in 5000 yards of a "Sacred Site" what ever Early Asian Immigrants might think is some BS fictional site.
Remember before the Spainsh arrived the Early Asian Immigrants lived in a Stone Age era life. No written language , no metal tools, ECT

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

12:56 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

What is the purpose of you continually espousing your opinions of Native American history in relation to this debate? Where is the relevance? Are you trying to imply that Native Americans are somehow inferior based on your perception of their history, and so somehow should not be permitted to lobby their representatives for legislation that benefits them or protects their religious history?

You very much appear to be racist and bigoted.

Comment_arrow

Leroy Achoy

1:11 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

They lived in the Stone Age and that is a Fact that can not bechanged or twisted around.
It is the truth, like it or not

Is the truth racist and bigoted?

Rich Loomis

12:51 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Chris/ Temecula Paul
What your telling me is crazy. First of all there isn't a person I know who is crazy enough to just stand looking at the wind sucking in air borne dust, if they do they deserve to get sick. Perhaps you know someone in Temecula that does?. My brother and sister both had breathing problems when they were young. It was due to them smoking and some because of their allergyies. This is my thoughts. We all have some kind of problems, jobs, lack of enough money and a lot of other things perhaps you can cure that as well.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

1:09 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

It doesn't take standing looking at the wind "sucking in air borne dust"... very small quanitites is all it takes (OSHA allows 0.1 mg/m3). Again, we are talking VERY SMALL quantities over time. Crystalline silica isn't the same as average dust and is created, in this case, in the blasting of solid rock, turning natural mineral and crystal in the rock into airborne dust in the form of silica. The prevailing winds in those hills will blow a steady stream of silica down onto Temecula and the surrounding area.

I am not here to cure your problems, I am simply voicing my opposition to something that will cause health problems for a significant number of people, which could unwittingly include you. And while you may be willing to risk lung cancer for the sake of this company that has NONE of our interests in mind, I am not.

The majority of the product to be produced at this mine is slated for SAN DIEGO County. NOT Riverside County. That should tell you something right there. There is no reason why the county should permit a project like this, within 10 miles and upwind of hundreds of thousands of residents.

None of this is just my opinion; many, many experts and physicians (other than the ones Granite pays for that don't live here) agree, and like it or not, no matter how much you try to downplay it for whatever your motivation is, it will not change the reality of the danger this company poses.

Leroy Achoy

1:07 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Just pointing out that without a written language, who knows where they had their "sacred sites". Rememeber in grade school when you took part in the Whispher game.
The word that the firt kid whisphered in the ear of the kid next to them was not the word that the last kid spoke after they went around the classroom.

Therefore their history is just made up as they go and can not be looked as anything but yarns and tall tales.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TVOR

7:24 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

The area was surveyed in the 1950's and many of the artifacts found then were turned over to the Pechanga tribe at that time. These artifacts were found in the entire area within a couple square miles of the two creeks now come together. There is no doubt that the area where the mine is proposed was heavily inhabited by the ancesters of today's Pechanga tribe.

Rich Loomis

1:11 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Temecula Paul,
As I remember the quarry is about1.5 from the river. By the way, the Tribe doesn't own the river. That belongs to the tax payers or more specifically, the Government and they have the water rights to all the water that now goes straight into the Ocean. So what. Because the tribe mentioned the Santa Margarita River. The old timers (Vail Family) constructed a dam and collected the water in Vail lake. This is water from the Santa Margraita River water shed. Just because they mentioned the river that doesn't make it so.
By the way,most people have contracts describing the way in which the people secured the properties, or they have a lease with an option to buy. It also shows boundries so that the buyer isn't buying something that isn't theirs. So lets get real. Telling me that the Tribes information is there private stuff, then don't expect anyone else to show their cards as well.

Reply

Leroy Achoy

1:15 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

If the Pachanga Early Asian Immigrants feel so strongly about the location of the quarry.
Why do they not make an offer to purchase the site at market value?

Reply

Brenda S

3:01 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Kat, thank you for writing in, all the arguing about who is right and who is wrong isn't going to change what is happening right NOW. Leroy, if you spent all that time that you have put into copy and pasting information to Chris you could have done something more productive with your life. Are you unemployed and this is why you think we need this Quarry so bad? We don't need this Quarry, please everyone stop for a few minutes and do what Kat and I have done. We went to the source and gave our opinion of what we think about this Quarry. Write your Senators, this is what we all need to do NOW!!!!

Reply

Don

3:03 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

What is it that Rich Loomis from "HEMET"' doesn't understand. Apart from 159 local doctors, 40,000 local residents, 159 businesses, and many local organisations are against this quarry. Oh, and I forgot to include most of the local wineries, and the Pechangas' that should tell you guys something. As was said before, Granite have the right to run a business and make money, we have a right to protect our health and the health of our children

Reply

Rich Loomis

3:29 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Brenda S. I want to commend you for giving advice to Kat. I will say that in most cases the reason that you would go to the folks in Sacramento, would be to stop something relating to our constitution or immigration Laws. This is a local issue, and has no reason to be part of a law created by a Assemblywoman in Long Beach.. We have laws that are mostly followed by most people. This is an emotional issue, and there is not a law that protects it. That is why the Laws are so written on the substance and not on emotion. This bill that has been proposed is a jobs killer, and will stop allmost any kind of industry currently in Temecula. This is a County and local area matter and should be dealt correctly with people who know the needs of the area. The Law people who seem to attempt to change each issue and how it applies is not looking at how it applies to the Master Plan approved in a given area.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TVOR

7:30 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

This bill won't kill any jobs. It will simply prevent a few folks from moving from other mines to the Temecula area. The few low paying jobs that might have gone to present residents of Temecula will not be missed in comparison with the real threat to the health of all of Temecula's citizens. Not to mention the harm it would do to the wineries in our area.

Rich Loomis

3:40 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Don, I will put it right back to you. The grape people have fears that their crops won't make a lot of money in wine profits. Your concern about all the people that currently live in Temecula currently of being sick. I think you mention 40,000 people and 159 doctors that might live in Temecula. But most doctors I know live in Bear Creek. They want to be away from all you folks that as you claim are sick. Perhaps I didn't quit understand your thoughts. I think that if they are sick now----well let's see, is it because of something else as the quarry isn't created yet? Perhaps it is that they came there sick from the LA smog?

Reply

Rayanne

5:40 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Why is someone from Hemet,having any say in what happens in our community? oh he must be a Granite lackey- prob being paid by the "comments"
Well as a Temecula resident , not one from a town so remote ( in many ways)
we prefer our " grape people" over you rock heads any day
'just sayin

Reply

TVOR

7:34 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Nobody has yet made an argument for the mine that stands up to any kind of scrutiny. It is plain as can be that a mine in the proposed location would be 99.9% bad for our community. It won't create any high paying jobs for curremnt Temecula residents and any jobs it would create for current Temecula residents would be entry level and not contribute much to our economy. Also it would irreparably harm sensitive archeological sites that have been identified for 60 years and more.

Reply

Leroy Achoy

7:38 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

The correct question is: why a Assemblywoman from LONG BEACH introducing a bill that affects Temecula?
How much was the BRIBE MONEY that was paid by the Pachanga Early Asian Immigrants

Reply

Leroy Achoy

7:39 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Again :
If the Pachanga Early Asian Immigrants feel so strongly about the location of the quarry.
Why do they not make an offer to purchase the site at market value

Reply

Leroy Achoy

7:48 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

The Pachanga Early Asian Immigrants sure DO NOT have a problem building a casino on thier "Sacered Land"

TVOR

The area was surveyed in the 1950's and many of the artifacts found then were turned over to the Pechanga tribe at that time. These artifacts were found in the entire area within a couple square miles of the two creeks now come together. There is no doubt that the area where the mine is proposed was heavily inhabited by the ancesters of today's Pechanga tribe.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TVOR

12:28 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Where the casino was built is land that was occupied by them for less than 150 years in comparison with the proposed quarry site which dates back in the 10,000 year range.

Leroy Achoy

8:03 am on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

How much was the BRIBE MONEY that was paid by the Pachanga Early Asian Immigrants paid to a Assemblywoman from LONG BEACH introducing a bill that affects Temecula?

Reply

moeras

10:26 am on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

funny and sad... is this guy Leroy for real??

Reply

Kat

11:35 am on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Thats that I wonder moeras, I know his kind tho.. sadly, attention needy, not enough growing up, pot stirring, look at me, look at me! negative attention is better then none..sad really
i've decided to pass over his ignorant comments from now on. Just come to check on others.

Reply

Don

2:47 pm on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Rich, Maybe I can try once again to explain some of the potential health problems.
According to the local health authorities, there are approximately 2,000 children in our school district with "Asthma:, Temecula is the perfect place for those kids to live as we presently have the best air in the County.The quarry would completely destroy that.
There are many Doctors who signed the petition that do live in Temecula, those that don't, do have offices here. but regardless of where they live, they still think a quarry would be bad for all of us.

Reply

Don

2:56 pm on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Rich, is it fair that the wine growers would start a wine business and do well, have thousands of tourists visit them every week, bringing in over 60,million dollars each year to the City, and then have a quarry come in, spread their dust and ruin the business. I doubt that the tourists will fall over themselves to come see a quarry.

Reply

Leroy Achoy

2:57 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

I guess that the Pachanga's are glad that the Spanish and later the Americans came and got them out of their stone age existence.

If in 10,000 years they were not able to figure out how to have a written language, would in 10,000 more years would they still be living in the stone age?

Reply

Leroy Achoy

8:50 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Civ·i·li·za·tion Pronunciation: \ ,si-v?-l?-'za-sh?n\

Function: noun:
a) A relatively high level of cultural and technological development ; specifically : the stage of cultural development at which writing and the keeping of written records is attained.
Courtesy of Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

Reply

Leroy Achoy

8:50 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

How undeveloped were their? Examples:
The American Indian had not yet discovered how to make or use the wheel. Up until they were given wheels to move things, they were lashing their possessions together with strips of animal hide and dragging or carrying them. (They had not even used a domesticated horse until Cortez provided them.)
They had not developed a simple written language - they were drawing images on rocks.

Historians estimate that they had live on this continent for over 10,000 years and they had not yet developed paper.
They tied small sharpened stones to sticks and threw them at the quarry because they had not yet figured out how to make a simple metal utensil to kill their food.

The American Indian was a very undeveloped civilization. Had the white man not arrived, how long was it going to take for the American Indian to invent the electric light bulb? At the rate that they were advancing, it was probably going to take 300,000 more years for them to create a microwave oven or a gasoline engine.
They believed that they could influence the weather, a successful hunt and many other aspects of their lives by dancing around a fire.

It's anyone's guess if they would have every figured out how to make the optics needed to make a microscope to cure diseases. Would they ever have developed antibiotics to deal with simple infections?

Reply

Alice Zyetz

4:33 pm on Wednesday, August 31, 2011

To quote Rich, "This is a County and local area matter and should be dealt correctly with people who know the needs of the area."

And the local area people have said a resounding "NO!" Enough already!

Reply

Rich Loomis

5:38 pm on Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Alice,
I hope the day doesn't come that you will want to build or buy something that is or around Temecula. The reason I am saying that is because it might be sacred as described by the bill AB742, proclaiming that no person will be able to have a business something like that of Granite as it will be refused. This may also involve folks who now have the large mansions on the hills (SOS Hills) not far from the quarry, that Granite was hoping to get passed. This was a place for people to work close to their homes. I am sure that wasn't even thought of by those who claimed "NIMBY" at the hearings. It is real sad that the folks can't understand the Government is not going to give us a stimulus to help. Their thoughts, to all those who really need help, get a job. it is apparent that the Tribe has had an influence not only in Sacramento, but as of now Temecula. I wonder, what would happen if their business would be outlawed?

Reply

Kat

7:06 pm on Wednesday, August 31, 2011

;-D thank goodness!!! hoorahhh!!!!

Reply

Leave a comment