A Temecula man facing an assault charge for allegedly swerving too close to a group of bicyclists and clipping one on the hand was out on $25,000 bail Thursday, awaiting a November court date.
Carl Albert Robbins, 38, was ordered to appear in court Nov. 28 to answer a charge of assault with a deadly weapon, other than a firearm, according to sheriff's records.
Robbins allegedly swerved his sedan in a threatening manner near two groups of bicycle riders traveling west on Rainbow Canyon Road, according to Riverside County sheriff's Lt. Mike Maddux.
"It was an intentional act to swerve," Maddux told Patch, adding that he could not say whether the driver wanted to hurt the bicyclist.
"He used his car basically as intimidation," Maddux told Patch.
"He was upset," Maddux said of the driver. "He didn't think the bikes belonged on the roadway."
The incident occurred about 8:15 a.m. Tuesday, the lieutenant said, adding that "the guy got a slight cut on his hand."
Following the injury, the suspect stopped but the cyclists had also taken his license plate number, so fleeing the scene would have done him no good, the lieutenant said.
According to Maddux, "there's no indication they (the riders) were doing anything wrong.
"They have a right to the road," the lieutenant said, adding that the cyclists were riding in single file on the right side of the road.
221100(a) of the California Vehicle code which clearly states local authorities can regulate and even prohibit "assemblages" on the highways. So Temecula CAN adopt an ordnance that prohibits this type of riding.
This is the thing: I have been driving for 33 years and I have found it incredibly rare that I can't move over to pass a bicycle safely, usually before I even reach them. People like you keep trying to pretend that you are stuck behind bicyclists when you are not. This is really about your belief that you should not have to move over to pass. Moving over to pass is easy. I have done it many times. It's not a big deal and it's not a lot to ask.
As I've mentioned in other posts, I've found that there are two types of cyclists and drivers. There are: 1) The Majority of people who are willing, and wanting, to Share The Road. They are courteous, responsible citizens who choose to coexist. When I ride around town, I've found that the majority of drivers give way to me in narrow situations. Unfortunately, there are also: 2) The Minority, who's selfish actions cause friction between cyclist and drivers, sometimes with potentially harmful results, as in the driver stated in the article that started this discussion. Cyclists who are in this group are the ones mentioned in the posts above that increase the frustration of drivers and appear to give cyclists in general a bad name. The question is, to which group do you choose to belong? Those willing and wanting to share the road and coexist; or those who choose to be selfish and cause frustration in an already stressful world. Share The Road....
@V.W.D.S.: Groups of bicyclists are never hit accidentally. It doesn't happen. It isn't dangerous, no matter how hard you try to pretend that it is.
http://www.fastcoexist.com/1680611/bikes-arent-just-good-for-you-theyre-good-for-the-economy-too
If there is a bike lane, I'm happy to use one. But many roads are too narrow for a bike lane. They are also too narrow to pass side by side. Yesterday I did a little experiment. When I would ride close to the right inevitably cars would pass me at full speed with inches to spare. The further out into the lane I moved the more space a vehicle would give me when passing. I am not sure whether these drivers were being jerks.. but I think mainly I didn't make a blip in their consciousness. They are so focused on where they are going they don't see something on the side of the road and don't consider it. They pass within the same space even though there is not enough room. When I ride toward the center of the lane. Cars expect to see obstacles in their path and have more time to slow and pass with more space in the other lane. If I was riding with another person, I would still be in the same place so riding side by side doesn't take up more room. When riding with friends though I'd prefer if we were side by side to be better seen but usually someone goes faster than the other. So, the motorist will need to move out for longer or make more passes. A driver may be annoyed, but I'd rather be seen than hit.
Watch this video and tell me if you would let your child ride with you? https://vimeo.com/25215833
"No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." This is the law a motorist is ticketed with when he rear-ends another road user. (The reasonable and prudent speed being the speed of the vehicle in front of you, be it a car or a bicycle.)
Show us the law that says you have a right to travel as fast as you want all the time.
Crybaby drivers like the ones in this forum I can live with. Ones who let their anger control their actions don't belong behind the wheel.
Since I got educated in bicycle safety several years ago I don't have unintentional close calls. I don't have close passes. I don't have right hooks. I don't have dooring close calls. I feel dramatically safer. You can pretend all you want that you understand safety. I know what works and I know why it works. I know this because I was able to admit that I didn't know it all and I could learn from people who knew more than me. As long as you cling to the arrogant belief that you know bicycle safety without studying it, you won't. As for the ignorant psycho drivers, we need to start putting them in prison. Helmet mounted cameras are getting quite cheap and I know of several convictions of road raging drivers based upon the evidence they provide. The psychopaths are no longer anonymous.
Whatta fool, I drive that route daily in my SUV and see the same Motorhome parked curbside , my son always reminds me saying isn't that the guy that steered his vehicle into you,
Most right lanes are too narrow for a bicycle and a car to travel safely side by side within the lane. Why don't you understand that?
I totally get that. You're misreading my sentence. I am saying that if you are riding two or three abreast for the purpose of socializing, then please don't do that.
You're making a generalized argument based upon a relatively rare edge case. What is so difficult about moving over to pass a bicyclist safely? I find it incredibly easy in my current sports car and have previously found it incredibly easy in SUV's, full sized pickups and even moving vans weren't that tough. You guys put a lot of time and effort into avoiding the most trivial inconvenience in driving.
I'm mostly on your side, billdsd. But it strikes me that you are very idealistic and have the notion that there's a chance that people out there will one day start obeying the letter of the law. They never will. So we must use common sense and make the best of what is a very imperfect situation. I always try to know and follow the law – when driving a car, when cycling or walking/running. I do so in no small part so that I can be justified if I must argue my point in the case of a conflict. But I also try to exercise courtesy, empathy and even adapt my behavior to the particular situation that besets me. I try to keep myself safe while being good to others and perhaps being a sort of ambassador for non-motorized road users.
In the very rare case that it isn't, you wait. I've done it; not many times but I have done it. The world did not come to an end. I've had to slow down and wait for slow motorists thousands of times, many times not being able to pass for as much as a half hour on mountain roads. Bicyclists are much easier to pass than motorists. Are most roads winding mountain roads? Do we have a lot of bad weather here in southern California? Do you never have to slow down for other motor vehicles? The fact is that bicyclists inconvenience you far less often and for far smaller time losses than other motorists do. You can pretend that you having to go slow for a few minutes behind bicyclist is an unbearable hardship. It's not the truth. It's a dishonest rationalization for the delusion that you shouldn't have to suffer a trivial inconvenience.
I'm thinking more globally than you in more ways than one. I am not writing you from CA. A road does not by any means have to be a mountain road to be curvy and or hilly. I'm not in disagreement with you that motorists must wait at a safe distance behind bicycles until a safe pass can be executed. It is indeed in inconvenience, and sadly, operating a motor vehicle engenders feelings of might and superiority, making an inconvenience extra unbearable. To be fair, I'll acknowledge that in cases where traffic is heavy and hectic, it is very easy for drivers to slip into a frustrated – even frenzied – mindset caused by getting stuck in traffic and the myriad frustrations that come along with trying to get somewhere in a car on busy roads. A side effect of this is the tendency to try to get ahead at any chance. The thought of having to slow to some 10 mph and wait behind a cyclist can seem unbearable. I'm not saying it's right. I'm just facing reality. I try never to drive because I despise what it does to people. Well, carry on and fight the good fight, fellow cyclist.
I'm not militant either. I don't make violent threats against other people. That's what the anti-cyclists do. Giving in to bullies only encourages them.