In front of more than 100 people who were sharing hugs and smiles—and with Pu`eska Mountain as a backdrop—tribal chairman of the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians Marc Macarro officially announced during an impromptu news conference Thursday that the tribe closed escrow on 365 acres of land that was the site of the much-contested Liberty Quarry owned by Watsonville, Calif.-based Granite Construction.
Macarro said Pechanga has no intention of developing the land, which was purchased at a sale price of $3 million. As part of the negotiation, the tribe agreed to pay Granite an additional $17.3 million through a comprehensive settlement.
Due to legal issues, the tribe was not able to disclose the deal until escrow closed Thursday, Macarro said during the news conference held on the rooftop of a Pechanga Resort & Casino parking structure.
“The story of this mountain is not over,” Macarro told the crowd as he looked over to Pu`eska, the site of the proposed quarry. He said the nearly seven-year fight over the quarry should serve as a reminder of what it means to be good stewards of land.
The Liberty Quarry project, which Macarro said would have encompassed 90 square miles, was bitterly challenged by many Temeculans, who argued the mining operation would have blighted nearby hillsides, caused increased pollution and traffic, and was not a great job creator or a necessary service.
The quarry’s main product would have been aggregate, and Riverside County Supervisor Bob Buster said the bulk of it would have gone to San Diego, which he claims can now meet its demands for the rock.
Tribal leaders, along with City of Temecula council members Maryann Edwards, Mike Naggar and Jeff Comerchero, as well as Buster and Riverside County Supervisor Jeff Stone, were on hand for Thursday’s news conference. Dozens of anti-quarry activists donning their orange caps and shirts also showed up.
Temecula resident Kathleen Hamilton has been hailed as the lead organizer on the anti-quarry movement, and she told Patch that Thursday was indeed a very good day.
“It’s done,” she said with a long, smiling sigh.
Rainbow resident Jerri Arganda, who has also fought the seven-year battle against the quarry alongside Hamilton, said, “This means peace. We don’t have to worry about what’s going to happen next.”
As part of the settlement announced Thursday, Granite has agreed that through 2035, it will not own or operate a quarry within a six-mile radius to the north of the property along the Riverside-San Diego County border and three miles to the south.
Supervisors Stone and Buster have both opposed the quarry despite votes from their colleagues in support of the mining operation. Buster said the fight against the quarry was the greatest grassroots effort he has witnessed during his tenure and said Thursday’s news serves as a reminder that the county has to do a better job of balancing economic interests with environmental concerns in the short- and long-term.
“[The tribe’s] reverence for their lands should inform all of us in the future,” he said.
The tribe has maintained Pu`eska Mountain is sacred Indian burial ground.
“The debacle of democracy has been corrected," Stone said. "When the citizens speak they need to be heard and in the case of Temecula, they need to be reckoned with.”
The City of Temecula, which has also opposed the quarry, has filed lawsuits over the issue, including a suit that claims the county erred in certifying an Environmental Impact Report for the project after it was first rejected by the board of supervisors.
Temecula's Mayor Pro Tem Mike Naggar said council members will now need to meet with staff to discuss the pending litigation.
“There were a lot of city resources going to legal fees,” Naggar said. “We can now stand down.”
As for the suit against the county, Naggar said the city will need to look at its options.
I will not get into a pissing match with you. The question: " Is it a matter of nature or nurture?" is often asked. The tragedy; continuing corruption that has been unfolding demonstrates many aspects of that question. What compels some humans to snatch everything; big or small for themselves...no matter the often tragic consequences to criminals and their victims? What compels some humans to act with animal savagery against other humans? Is it societal conditioning? Familial conditioning? Laughing and mocking; ...phone calls among jackals; are not my concern. Only the highest power can exorcise you of the demons that rob you of your humanity....that power is within you... We all have the capacity for good and bad...I wish you good. I do not know what the trigger event or events that have caused you to develop such a calloused spirits and hearts were. I wish you well....
http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/cgi/prosoma.dll?searchby=offender&id=18600339E6259&lang=ENGLISH&W6=718497 People of Pechanga, I'd put a muzzle on this guy if you don't want him representing you in the press. If it's the same guy, that's just nasty, and I can't see how anyone could trust anything he says.
Offense Code 288(a) Description LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS ACTS WITH A CHILD UNDER 14 YEARS OF AGE Yeah, all I hear is the barking of a pervert. I appreciate people of Pechanga, what they do for Temecula and California, and am thankful for the help with the quarry, however; I am not thankful for you. I actually know you Vincent. We've met a couple of times. I was always disgusted by your mere presence. In case YOU haven't noticed, I said nothing negative about the people of Pechanga, except for you. You say that you're not representing them, but you really are. You should probably seek an opinion from a more powerful family on the rez before commenting any more. Why would you embarrass the other families like you're doing? If I didn't know better, I would just chalk it up to your fat paycheck making you think you're better than everyone else, but, I do know better. I know that you have control issues, but that's between you and God.
Your comment about welfare is terribly ironic since the disenrolled members had to move on to public assistance. If the rumor is true that the rule is changing, I wouldn't mind having to shell out my tax dollars to support you for a while. Why are you, and the other CPP supporters so angry and bitter toward the disenrolled, when you KNOW that it was only a few that really didn't belong? Why can't anyone from the tribe actually say why the tribe ignored Dr. John Johnson's independent report, which was thorough and unbiased, and commissioned by the Pechanga Government? They hired him to find the truth, and then believed a lie? What's your opinion on that, Vincent? Will we see you sidestep this one with a vague answer like all the rest?
As you can see, he can't defend himself against the truth. There is no personal vendetta here. He opened himself up by vomiting his words above. I'm just making clear the source. The more he types, the more others can understand what is really hiding behind the words.
They are coward pussies and we see you can trash talk a sex offender , shut up and go away. I see the disenrolled blog all two of them.